Compare the evidence
Kratos vs Gilat vs Viasat
Compare virtualized ground systems, modem platforms and ground antennas. Demonstrations, contract awards, operational acceptance and recurring service availability are different milestones.
Read horizontally within each row. Product ratings, planned capacity, completed deliveries and current financials describe different stages.
On narrow screens, scroll the comparison horizontally. Each figure keeps its period, accounting definition and source. GAAP cash flow, adjusted margins, segment gross profit and EBITDA are not interchangeable.
| Research dimension | Kratos Defense & Security SolutionsKTOS · Checked 2026-10-21 | Gilat Satellite NetworksGILT · Checked 2026-10-21 | ViasatVSAT · Checked 2026-10-21 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial role | Virtualized satellite ground systems and RF infrastructure | Satellite modems, terminals and ground platforms | Satellite ground antennas and network infrastructure |
| Constraint to test | Interoperability, ground-segment integration and operational acceptance | Qualified satellite access links and ground-network integration | Reliable multi-orbit links, ground-site deployment and integration |
| Reported evidence and sources | Kratos reports a multi-vendor 5G NR non-terrestrial network connectivity demonstration using its OpenSpace ground platform.
| Gilat lists SkyEdge II-c ground architecture and router/modem families for mobility, broadband, backhaul and enterprise use.
| Viasat describes ground antenna systems and ground-station services for satellite communications and Earth observation.
|
| Capacity and delivery |
|
|
|
| Reported economics | Not quantified in this profile. | Not quantified in this profile. | |
| Evidence coverage | Primary-source operating or segment results; capacity evidence retains its stated stage. Constraint-specific revenue, pricing power and valuation remain unquantified; product relevance is not proof of pure-play exposure. No quantified share of revenue attributable to the specific constraint. No evidence-strength score is assigned. | Public product or operations profile. Quantitative economic exposure has not been reviewed here. Constraint-specific revenue, pricing power and valuation remain unquantified; product relevance is not proof of pure-play exposure. No quantified share of revenue attributable to the specific constraint. No evidence-strength score is assigned. | Public product or operations profile. Quantitative economic exposure has not been reviewed here. Constraint-specific revenue, pricing power and valuation remain unquantified; product relevance is not proof of pure-play exposure. No quantified share of revenue attributable to the specific constraint. No evidence-strength score is assigned. |
| Counter-evidence | No separately sourced counter-evidence review is included in this baseline. The conditions below are research tests. | No separately sourced counter-evidence review is included in this baseline. The conditions below are research tests. | No separately sourced counter-evidence review is included in this baseline. The conditions below are research tests. |
| Next to monitor |
|
|
|
| What would weaken the case? |
|
|
|
Open in Excel or another spreadsheet. Each entry preserves its source, date and accounting definition; research interpretations are labeled.
How to use this comparison
Start with the constraint, inspect the dated sources, then follow the company to monitor new evidence. A documented industrial role does not establish a shortage or an attractive share price.
This comparison uses open company research checked on the dates shown. Valuation and expected returns require a separate review.